NoFOMO
搜索 中EN 登录 注册

最高第 1 名 现在第 2 名

可解释性研究被视为最重要科学问题

Nick Cammarata称可解释性可能是当今最重要科学问题,他曾在OpenAI从事机械可解释性研究并感悲观,后发起首个大规模自动化可解释性项目。

名次变化

要点

  • Nick Cammarata 称他曾在 OpenAI 参与机制可解释性的早期研究,后来启动了 OpenAI 首个大规模自动化可解释性项目,用当时的原始工具发现有约 2% 的神经元是可读的。
  • 他表示,用现代 agentic 工具来看,规模直到万亿参数的模型中绝大多数都是可读的,许多著名的纠缠神经元案例其实是被误解了。
  • 他表示自己现在认为,雄心勃勃的可解释性会在最需要它的时候被解决,而且可能相当快。

要点和反应摘要由 AI 依据本页推文整理,请以原推为准。 我们怎么用 AI

原推

Nick @nickcammarata 10.3万 粉丝

interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works https://t.co/zHij5zwKGT
8,721点赞 1,183转发 405回复 82.1万浏览

在 X 上查看 收藏

X 上的热门回复

X 上的反应: 回复总体是支持和叫好的,有人追问这套方法在新型非 transformer 架构上是否也行得通;原推作者没有回应。

登录后查看 X 上的 5 条热门回复

来自 @simonsarris, @robinhanson, @bayeslord 等,已过滤广告,附中英文翻译。

免费注册 已有账号?登录

讨论 0

还没有人讨论,来说第一句。

推荐信源

觉得我们漏了哪个一手信源,或者该关注什么话题?告诉我们。审核通过后,所有人的榜单都会覆盖到它。

@用户名,或者主页链接