NoFOMO
搜索 中EN 登录 注册

最高第 1 名 现在第 1 名

投资者建议系统性囤币

Chris Burniske 建议长期投资者以 ETH 为参照,系统性增持相对单位,而非纠结进出场。

名次变化

要点

  • @cburniske 表示,长期投资者应系统性地累积单位,而不是在进场上犹豫不决,并称交易者是另一套游戏。
  • 他提到 $ZEC 是另一个例子,因其供应量与 $BTC 相近,建议把“梦想的 BTC 数量”作为 ZEC 的累积目标。

要点和反应摘要由 AI 依据本页推文整理,请以原推为准。 我们怎么用 AI

原推

Chris Burniske @cburniske 34.3万 粉丝

In times like this, if you're a long term investor, you don't want to be waffling about being in or out, you want to be stacking units systematically. Don't get confused by the traders, it's a separate game. On unit accumulation, depending on how long you've been in the game, it's helpful to think in "relative units" of the investment you did best with. I'll use $ETH because the math is easy and relates well to younger networks. ETH has ~120M units. Let's say I once held 10 ETH. Now I'm looking to stack $SOL, but SOL has ~636M units, or ~5.3x the # of units. Therefore, to have an equivalent position size in network terms, I'd need 53 SOL. If I want to own double the network % of SOL, that I owned of ETH, I'd need 106 SOL. Or, perhaps I'm considering $TIA, which has ~1.16B total supply, or ~9.7x the # of units of ETH. In that case, I'd need 97 units of TIA to have a network equivalent. If I want to place a bigger network bet on TIA, because the network value is lower than when I entered ETH, then 10x the % ownership would require me to accumulate 970 TIA. 100x the % ownership = 9,700 TIA. Going for significantly more ownership, at cheap prices, if you're right, can lead to asymmetric outcomes. $ZEC is another good example of this, since its supply mirrors $BTC's. And so it's easy to think of your "dream # of BTC," and aim to accumulate that in ZEC, if you're so inclined. Pick your networks of choice, and do the math. I have always found thinking in unit terms keeps me grounded, optimistic, and goal oriented in dreary times. I can then dream about future upside in the thick of the bull, but the important thing is to systematically stack the units with a high conviction methodology in the bear or early-bull pullbacks. In terms of where we are now, which is probably why most of you are still reading :) BTC has been bleeding out the long-tail while remaining resilient, with many names 20-40%+ down from the highs while BTC is down just shy of 10%. You can either say BTC has already bled the risk appetite out of the market and so most of the work is done, or you can say BTC hasn't dropped much so it'll be really terrible if it goes cliff diving. I'm sympathetic to the former view. I read this as an early-bull opportunity rather than a warning sign that this move was a "bull trap," and so I'm inclined to be a buyer. You have to respect the possibility of lower levels, and so tranche out any dry powder that remains with % cash used corresponding to % probability those levels are the local bottom - yes, you likely end up with some excess cash if not all levels are hit, but that's okay. And don't forget, there's already opportunity in front of you.
435点赞 37转发 45回复 2.6万浏览

在 X 上查看 收藏

X 上的热门回复

登录后查看 X 上的 4 条热门回复

来自 @MustStopMurad, @degengambleh, @sffutures 等,已过滤广告,附中英文翻译。

免费注册 已有账号?登录

讨论 0

还没有人讨论,来说第一句。

推荐信源

觉得我们漏了哪个一手信源,或者该关注什么话题?告诉我们。审核通过后,所有人的榜单都会覆盖到它。

@用户名,或者主页链接