NoFOMO
Search 中EN Sign in Sign up

Peaked at #1 Off the board

CZ Jokes Math Complement with Vitalik

CZ quoted Vitalik's post on AI math risks to crypto, joking his 0.01/100 math score complements Vitalik's 99.99.

Rank over time

Key points

  • CZ quotes Vitalik Buterin's post warning about the risks to cryptography from AI-accelerated math and saying the core new area of risk is ML-DSA / FHE / lattices.
  • CZ posts that Vitalik's math score is 99.99/100 and his own math score is 0.01/100.

Key points and the reaction summary are written by AI from the posts on this page. Check the original post. How we use AI

Original post

CZ 🔶 BNB @cz_binance 13M followers

Vitalik's math score: 99.99/100 My math score: 0.01/100 So, together, we might make it into something... 🤣 (interesting thread 👇 to read, even if you understand as little as I do)Quoting @VitalikButerin: I don't recommend anyone scramble to move their funds to new wallets today. But we should take the risks to cryptography from AI-accelerated math seriously, and minimize our exposure to not just quantum-vulnerable cryptography, but also potentially AI-vulnerable cryptography. The core new area of risk from this viewpoint is, unfortunately, ML-DSA / FHE / lattices. (and it's also another reason,
3,393likes 227reposts 527replies 449.3Kviews

View on X Save

Top replies on X

Reaction on X: Replies mostly joke about CZ's self-deprecating math score, with several saying they did not understand Vitalik's technical post; one reply notes Vitalik's point that AI might find shortcuts in both today's cryptography and post-quantum systems.

Sign in to see 5 top replies from X

From @MoEthWhale, @QuintenFrancois, @brhmpkjp and others. Spam removed, with English and Chinese translations.

Sign up free Have an account? Sign in

Discussion 0

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

Suggest a source

Is there a first-hand source we're missing, or a topic we should watch? Tell us. Once approved, everyone's board covers it.

@username or profile link