最高第 2 名 现在第 6 名
论AI加速下软件需更快重写
poteto 评论 Proton CTO 的AI宣言,称AI带来弹性工程劳动力,软件需按更快节奏重写。
要点
- @poteto 认为软件需要重建和重写以适应更快的节奏,代码将从一滴一滴到来变为像连续的水流一样被写出。
- @poteto 表示 AI 带来了由每位工程师掌握的极具弹性和能力的劳动力,系统必须进化以让智能体蓬勃发展。
- @dhh 称 Proton CTO 的 AI 备忘录里没有任何丑闻,认为 404 把它当成丑闻很可笑,并说因此 revolt 的员工将经历艰难时期。
- @josephfcox 分享了一份 Proton CTO 的 AI 宣言,称自己拿到了多份副本。
要点和反应摘要由 AI 依据本页推文整理,请以原推为准。 我们怎么用 AI
原推
we will need to rebuild and rewrite much of software to adapt to a new, faster pace.
code used to arrive one drop at a time. soon, if not already, code will be written as if it were a continuous stream, like a violent river twisting and turning as it pleases.
this is not a new thing: big tech cos have had to deal with this with the enormous scale of their engineering teams. but now ai has brought an incredibly elastic and capable workforce wielded by every engineer. this is your problem now, and the only way to adapt is to evolve your systems so agents - even and especially the ones with little context about the right way of doing things - can thrive. make the easy thing the right thing.
your codebase is becoming organic architecture. agent contributions grow around the constraints and guardrails you’ve designed. good software engineering matters even more now! and no, the continuous stream of code is not something you have to watch helplessly. be more ambitious and design systems, frameworks, and languages to control the chaos.
the time for mourning coding is long over引用 @josephfcox: Here is Proton CTO's AI manifesto, that I obtained multiple copies of https://t.co/6o7G2teu9A https://t.co/d92L1kv8AU
X 上的热门回复
X 上的反应: 回复整体偏向支持原推,原推作者称拒绝适应的组织需要休克疗法。也有人反驳:有人反对把渗透测试说成"弱者的失败者心态",有人说缺乏 CLI/API 让 Proton 在智能体时代不可用,还有人指出备忘录与 404 的文章内容不符。
讨论 0
注册 登录 后参与讨论
还没有人讨论,来说第一句。